You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Goal-directed fluid management based on pulse pressure variation monitoring during high-risk surgery: a pilot randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, September 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc6117 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marcel R Lopes, Marcos A Oliveira, Vanessa Oliveira S Pereira, Ivaneide Paula B Lemos, Jose Otavio C Auler, Frédéric Michard |
| Abstract |
Several studies have shown that maximizing stroke volume (or increasing it until a plateau is reached) by volume loading during high-risk surgery may improve post-operative outcome. This goal could be achieved simply by minimizing the variation in arterial pulse pressure (deltaPP) induced by mechanical ventilation. We tested this hypothesis in a prospective, randomized, single-centre study. The primary endpoint was the length of postoperative stay in hospital. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 288 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| Canada | 3 | 1% |
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 271 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 41 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 40 | 14% |
| Researcher | 39 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 8% |
| Other | 89 | 31% |
| Unknown | 34 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 210 | 73% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Engineering | 6 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 4% |
| Unknown | 45 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,655,922
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,318
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,012
of 82,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.