↓ Skip to main content

Goal-directed fluid management based on pulse pressure variation monitoring during high-risk surgery: a pilot randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
333 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
269 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Goal-directed fluid management based on pulse pressure variation monitoring during high-risk surgery: a pilot randomized controlled trial
Published in
Critical Care, September 2007
DOI 10.1186/cc6117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcel R Lopes, Marcos A Oliveira, Vanessa Oliveira S Pereira, Ivaneide Paula B Lemos, Jose Otavio C Auler, Frédéric Michard

Abstract

Several studies have shown that maximizing stroke volume (or increasing it until a plateau is reached) by volume loading during high-risk surgery may improve post-operative outcome. This goal could be achieved simply by minimizing the variation in arterial pulse pressure (deltaPP) induced by mechanical ventilation. We tested this hypothesis in a prospective, randomized, single-centre study. The primary endpoint was the length of postoperative stay in hospital.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 1%
Canada 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 252 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 40 15%
Student > Postgraduate 39 14%
Researcher 38 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 9%
Student > Master 22 8%
Other 86 32%
Unknown 21 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 205 76%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Engineering 7 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 1%
Computer Science 3 1%
Other 11 4%
Unknown 30 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,806,871
of 18,639,770 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,657
of 5,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,238
of 233,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#26
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,639,770 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,479 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.