↓ Skip to main content

Establishing a large prospective clinical cohort in people with head and neck cancer as a biomedical resource: head and neck 5000

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Establishing a large prospective clinical cohort in people with head and neck cancer as a biomedical resource: head and neck 5000
Published in
BMC Cancer, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-14-973
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew Robert Ness, Andrea Waylen, Katrina Hurley, Mona Jeffreys, Chris Penfold, Miranda Pring, Sam Leary, Christine Allmark, Stu Toms, Susan Ring, Tim J Peters, Will Hollingworth, Helen Worthington, Chris Nutting, Sheila Fisher, Simon N Rogers, Steven J Thomas, The Head and Neck 5000 Study Team

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 66 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 18%
Other 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Master 6 9%
Professor 3 4%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 19 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Psychology 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 25 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2018.
All research outputs
#17,392,671
of 25,517,918 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#4,597
of 9,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,285
of 348,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#89
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,517,918 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,010 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.