↓ Skip to main content

Mapping evidence on charitable food assistance system’s compliance with safety and general hygiene requirements in Africa and the rest of the world: a systematic scoping review protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mapping evidence on charitable food assistance system’s compliance with safety and general hygiene requirements in Africa and the rest of the world: a systematic scoping review protocol
Published in
Systematic Reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13643-018-0907-2
Authors

Sizwe Makhunga, Tivani Mashamba-Thompson, Khumbulani Hlongwana

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 11 19%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 21 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 11 19%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Environmental Science 3 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 20 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2019.
All research outputs
#8,841,636
of 14,110,318 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#981
of 1,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,349
of 368,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#190
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,110,318 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.