You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Development of best practice guidelines for suicide-related crisis response and aftercare in the emergency department or other acute settings: a Delphi expert consensus study
BMC Psychiatry, January 2019
Nicole T. M. Hill, Fiona Shand, Michelle Torok, Lyndal Halliday, Nicola J. Reavley
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||14||58%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||2||8%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||20||20%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||11||11%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||10||10%|
|Student > Bachelor||3||3%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||13||13%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||12||12%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||3||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2019.
All research outputs
of 24,493,651 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
of 5,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 445,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,493,651 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.