↓ Skip to main content

Self-Harm Intervention: Family Therapy (SHIFT), a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of family therapy versus treatment as usual for young people seen after a second or subsequent…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
335 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Self-Harm Intervention: Family Therapy (SHIFT), a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of family therapy versus treatment as usual for young people seen after a second or subsequent episode of self-harm
Published in
Trials, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13063-015-1007-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandra Wright-Hughes, Elizabeth Graham, Amanda Farrin, Michelle Collinson, Paula Boston, Ivan Eisler, Sarah Fortune, Jonathan Green, Allan House, David Owens, Mima Simic, Sandy Tubeuf, Jane Nixon, Christopher McCabe, Michael Kerfoot, David Cottrell

Abstract

Self-harm is common in the community with a lifetime prevalence of 13 %. It is associated with an elevated risk of overall mortality and suicide. People who harm themselves are high users of public services. Estimates of the 1-year risk of repetition vary between 5 and 15 % per year. Currently, limited evidence exists on the effectiveness of clinical interventions for young people who engage in self-harm. Recent reviews have failed to demonstrate any effect on reducing repetition of self-harm among adolescents receiving a range of treatment approaches. Family factors are particularly important risk factors associated with fatal and non-fatal self-harm among children and adolescents. Family therapy focuses on the relationships, roles and communication patterns between family members, but there have been relatively few studies of specifically family-focused interventions with this population. The Self-Harm Intervention: Family Therapy (SHIFT) Trial was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (grant no. 07/33/01) following a commissioned call for this research. SHIFT is a pragmatic, phase III, multicentre, individually randomised, controlled trial comparing Family Therapy (FT) with treatment as usual (TAU) for adolescents aged 11 to 17 who have engaged in at least two episodes of self-harm. Both therapeutic interventions were delivered within the National Health Service (NHS) Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) in England. Participants and therapists were, of necessity, aware of treatment allocation, but the researchers were blind to the allocations to allow unbiased collection of follow-up data. Primary outcome data (repetition of self-harm leading to hospital attendance 18 months post-randomisation) were collected from the Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC), augmented by directed searches of medical records at Acute Trusts. Secondary outcome data (including suicidal intent, depression, hopelessness and health economics) were collected at 12 and 18 months post-randomisation via researcher-participant interviews and by post at 3 and 6 months. SHIFT will provide a well-powered evaluation of the clinical and cost effectiveness of Family Therapy for young people who have self-harmed on more than one occasion. The study will be reported in 2016, and the results will inform clinical practice thereafter. ISRCTN59793150 . 26 January 2009.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 335 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 332 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 16%
Researcher 45 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 10%
Student > Bachelor 31 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 7%
Other 58 17%
Unknown 92 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 90 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 42 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 10%
Social Sciences 20 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 3%
Other 42 13%
Unknown 98 29%