You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
| Title |
Methodology capture: discriminating between the "best" and the rest of community practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, September 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-9-359 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James M Eales, John W Pinney, Robert D Stevens, David L Robertson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 6% |
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Malta | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 48 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 41% |
| Computer Science | 13 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 9% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 9% |