You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Echocardiography: a help in the weaning process
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc9076 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vincent Caille, Jean-Bernard Amiel, Cyril Charron, Guillaume Belliard, Antoine Vieillard-Baron, Philippe Vignon |
| Abstract |
To evaluate the ability of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) to detect the effects of spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) on central hemodynamics and to identify indices predictive of cardiac-related weaning failure. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 133 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 18% |
| Researcher | 21 | 15% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 24% |
| Unknown | 22 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 103 | 74% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Mathematics | 1 | <1% |
| Computer Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 27 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2022.
All research outputs
#16,045,990
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,210
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,810
of 104,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#26
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.