↓ Skip to main content

A comparison of microarray and MPSS technology platforms for expression analysis of Arabidopsis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comparison of microarray and MPSS technology platforms for expression analysis of Arabidopsis
Published in
BMC Genomics, November 2007
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-8-414
Pubmed ID
Authors

Junfeng Chen, Vikas Agrawal, Magnus Rattray, Marilyn AL West, Dina A St Clair, Richard W Michelmore, Sean J Coughlan, Blake C Meyers

Abstract

Several high-throughput technologies can measure in parallel the abundance of many mRNA transcripts within a sample. These include the widely-used microarray as well as the more recently developed methods based on sequence tag abundances such as the Massively Parallel Signature Sequencing (MPSS) technology. A comparison of microarray and MPSS technologies can help to establish the metrics for data comparisons across these technology platforms and determine some of the factors affecting the measurement of mRNA abundances using different platforms. We compared transcript abundance (gene expression) measurement data obtained using Affymetrix and Agilent microarrays with MPSS data. All three technologies were used to analyze the same set of mRNA samples; these samples were extracted from various wild type Arabidopsis thaliana tissues and floral mutants. We calculated correlations and used clustering methodology to compare the normalized expression data and expression ratios across samples and technologies. Abundance expression measurements were more similar between different samples measured by the same technology than between the same sample measured by different technologies. However, when expression ratios were employed, samples measured by different technologies were found to cluster together more frequently than with abundance expression levels.Furthermore, the two microarray technologies were more consistent with each other than with MPSS. We also investigated probe-position effects on Affymetrix data and tag-position effects in MPSS. We found a similar impact on Affymetrix and MPSS measurements, which suggests that these effects were more likely a characteristic of the RNA sample rather than technology-specific biases. Comparisons of transcript expression ratios showed greater consistency across platforms than measurements of transcript abundance. In addition, for measurements based on abundances, technology differences can mask the impact of biological differences between samples and tissues.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 6%
Italy 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Unknown 57 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Professor 7 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 4 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 65%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 11%
Computer Science 5 8%
Engineering 2 3%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 6 9%