↓ Skip to main content

Economic evaluation of telephone-based weight loss support for patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Economic evaluation of telephone-based weight loss support for patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomised controlled trial
Published in
BMC Public Health, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12889-018-6300-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kate M. O’Brien, Johanna M. van Dongen, Amanda Williams, Steven J. Kamper, John Wiggers, Rebecca K. Hodder, Elizabeth Campbell, Emma K. Robson, Robin Haskins, Chris Rissel, Christopher M. Williams

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 133 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Researcher 9 7%
Other 7 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 5%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 63 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 68 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2020.
All research outputs
#14,150,857
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#10,207
of 15,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,183
of 437,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#247
of 292 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,080 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 292 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.