You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How should risk be communicated to children: a cross-sectional study comparing different formats of probability information
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6947-9-26 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fiona Ulph, Ellen Townsend, Cris Glazebrook |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 64% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
| Scientists | 5 | 45% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Philippines | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 57 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 21% |
| Unknown | 9 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 15 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 16 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2020.
All research outputs
#5,168,900
of 25,193,883 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#445
of 2,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,028
of 120,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,193,883 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,133 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.