↓ Skip to main content

A comprehensive system for evaluation of remote sequence similarity detection

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, August 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comprehensive system for evaluation of remote sequence similarity detection
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, August 2007
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-8-314
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuan Qi, Ruslan I Sadreyev, Yong Wang, Bong-Hyun Kim, Nick V Grishin

Abstract

Accurate and sensitive performance evaluation is crucial for both effective development of better structure prediction methods based on sequence similarity, and for the comparative analysis of existing methods. Up to date, there has been no satisfactory comprehensive evaluation method that (i) is based on a large and statistically unbiased set of proteins with clearly defined relationships; and (ii) covers all performance aspects of sequence-based structure predictors, such as sensitivity and specificity, alignment accuracy and coverage, and structure template quality.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 8%
United Kingdom 1 4%
France 1 4%
South Africa 1 4%
Unknown 20 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 24%
Researcher 5 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 40%
Computer Science 6 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 16%
Engineering 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2008.
All research outputs
#15,240,835
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#5,353
of 7,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,856
of 68,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#30
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.