↓ Skip to main content

A system for computerised retinal haemorrhage analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A system for computerised retinal haemorrhage analysis
Published in
BMC Research Notes, January 2009
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-2-196
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tariq Aslam, Paul Chua, Matthew Richardson, Praveen Patel, Mohammed Musadiq

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 7%
Argentina 1 7%
Unknown 13 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 33%
Other 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Lecturer 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 6 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 20%
Computer Science 2 13%
Neuroscience 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2016.
All research outputs
#11,135,221
of 12,519,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#2,334
of 2,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,993
of 334,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,519,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,804 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.