↓ Skip to main content

A system for computerised retinal haemorrhage analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A system for computerised retinal haemorrhage analysis
Published in
BMC Research Notes, September 2009
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-2-196
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tariq Aslam, Paul Chua, Matthew Richardson, Praveen Patel, Mohammed Musadiq

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 6%
Argentina 1 6%
Unknown 16 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 28%
Other 2 11%
Lecturer 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Professor 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 6 33%
Computer Science 3 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 17%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2016.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#3,814
of 4,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,435
of 106,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#24
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.