↓ Skip to main content

Reliability of race assessment based on the race of the ascendants: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reliability of race assessment based on the race of the ascendants: a cross-sectional study
Published in
BMC Public Health, January 2002
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-2-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra C Fuchs, Sylvia M Guimarães, Cristine Sortica, Fernanda Wainberg, Karine O Dias, Mariana Ughini, José Augusto S Castro, Flavio D Fuchs

Abstract

The loss of participants in longitudinal studies due to non-contact, refusal or death can introduce bias into the results of such studies. The study described here examines reasons for refusal over three waves of a survey of persons aged >or=70 years. In a longitudinal study involving three waves, participants were compared to those who refused to participate but allowed an informant to be interviewed and to those who refused any participation. At Wave 1 both groups of Wave 2 non-participants had reported lower occupational status and fewer years of education, had achieved lower verbal IQ scores and cognitive performance scores and experienced some distress from the interview. Those with an informant interview only were in poorer physical health than those who participated and those who refused. Depression and anxiety symptoms were not associated with non-participation. Multivariate analyses found that verbal IQ and cognitive impairment predicted refusal. Results were very similar for refusers at both Waves 2 and 3. Longitudinal studies of the elderly may over estimate cognitive performance because of the greater refusal rate of those with poorer performance. However, there is no evidence of bias with respect to anxiety or depression.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 22%
Student > Master 2 9%
Lecturer 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 5 22%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 4 17%