↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Rationale and design of the Caloric Restriction and Exercise protection from Anthracycline Toxic Effects (CREATE) study: a 3-arm parallel group phase II randomized controlled trial in…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correction to: Rationale and design of the Caloric Restriction and Exercise protection from Anthracycline Toxic Effects (CREATE) study: a 3-arm parallel group phase II randomized controlled trial in early breast cancer
Published in
BMC Cancer, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12885-019-5298-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy A. Kirkham, D. Ian Paterson, Carla M. Prado, John R. Mackey, Kerry S. Courneya, Edith Pituskin, Richard B. Thompson

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Unspecified 3 5%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 28 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 14%
Unspecified 3 5%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 28 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2019.
All research outputs
#18,664,348
of 23,124,001 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#5,475
of 8,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#349,118
of 470,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#107
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,124,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,392 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.