You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Electronic patient record use during ward rounds: a qualitative study of interaction between medical staff
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, November 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc7134 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cecily Morrison, Matthew Jones, Alan Blackwell, Alain Vuylsteke |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 4% |
| United States | 5 | 4% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Cyprus | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 105 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 20% |
| Researcher | 23 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 15 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 36% |
| Computer Science | 20 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 19 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2021.
All research outputs
#3,274,649
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,656
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,365
of 179,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#4
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.