You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Accuracy of imputation to whole-genome sequence in sheep
|
---|---|
Published in |
Genetics Selection Evolution, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12711-018-0443-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sunduimijid Bolormaa, Amanda J. Chamberlain, Majid Khansefid, Paul Stothard, Andrew A. Swan, Brett Mason, Claire P. Prowse-Wilkins, Naomi Duijvesteijn, Nasir Moghaddar, Julius H. van der Werf, Hans D. Daetwyler, Iona M. MacLeod |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 67% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 3 | 50% |
Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
Researcher | 3 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 16% |
Unknown | 10 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 38% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 13% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 12 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2019.
All research outputs
#8,190,103
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Genetics Selection Evolution
#285
of 821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,697
of 446,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics Selection Evolution
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 821 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.