↓ Skip to main content

Nilotinib treatment in mouse models of P190 Bcr/Abl lymphoblastic leukemia

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Cancer, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nilotinib treatment in mouse models of P190 Bcr/Abl lymphoblastic leukemia
Published in
Molecular Cancer, October 2007
DOI 10.1186/1476-4598-6-67
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pavinder Kaur, Niklas Feldhahn, Bin Zhang, Daniel Trageser, Markus Müschen, Veerle Pertz, John Groffen, Nora Heisterkamp

Abstract

Ph-positive leukemias are caused by the aberrant fusion of the BCR and ABL genes. Nilotinib is a selective Bcr/Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor related to imatinib, which is widely used to treat chronic myelogenous leukemia. Because Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia only responds transiently to imatinib therapy, we have used mouse models to test the efficacy of nilotinib against lymphoblastic leukemia caused by the P190 form of Bcr/Abl. After transplant of 10,000 highly malignant leukemic cells into compatible recipients, untreated mice succumbed to leukemia within 21 days, whereas mice treated with 75 mg/kg nilotinib survived significantly longer. We examined cells from mice that developed leukemia while under treatment for Bcr/Abl kinase domain point mutations but these were not detected. In addition, culture of such cells ex vivo showed that they were as sensitive as the parental cell line to nilotinib but that the presence of stromal support allowed resistant cells to grow out. Nilotinib also exhibited impressive anti-leukemia activity in P190 Bcr/Abl transgenic mice that had developed overt leukemia/lymphoma masses and that otherwise would have been expected to die within 7 days. Visible lymphoma masses disappeared within six days of treatment and leukemic cell numbers in peripheral blood were significantly reduced. Treated mice survived more than 30 days. These results show that nilotinib has very impressive anti-leukemia activity but that lymphoblastic leukemia cells can become unresponsive to it both in vitro and in vivo through mechanisms that appear to be Bcr/Abl independent.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 4%
India 1 4%
Unknown 24 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 27%
Student > Master 5 19%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Chemistry 2 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,357,941
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Cancer
#1,043
of 1,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,458
of 76,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Cancer
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.