You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of different components of triple-H therapy on cerebral perfusion in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc8886 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jan W Dankbaar, Arjen JC Slooter, Gabriel JE Rinkel, Irene C vander Schaaf |
| Abstract |
Triple-H therapy and its separate components (hypervolemia, hemodilution, and hypertension) aim to increase cerebral perfusion in subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) patients with delayed cerebral ischemia. We systematically reviewed the literature on the effect of triple-H components on cerebral perfusion in SAH patients. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 215 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 33 | 14% |
| Other | 31 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 31 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 9% |
| Other | 61 | 26% |
| Unknown | 29 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 158 | 68% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2010.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,468
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,168
of 102,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#40
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.