↓ Skip to main content

Use of remote sensing to identify spatial risk factors for malaria in a region of declining transmission: a cross-sectional and longitudinal community survey

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of remote sensing to identify spatial risk factors for malaria in a region of declining transmission: a cross-sectional and longitudinal community survey
Published in
Malaria Journal, June 2011
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-10-163
Pubmed ID
Authors

William J Moss, Harry Hamapumbu, Tamaki Kobayashi, Timothy Shields, Aniset Kamanga, Julie Clennon, Sungano Mharakurwa, Philip E Thuma, Gregory Glass

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 128 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 21%
Researcher 23 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 27 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 8%
Environmental Science 10 7%
Social Sciences 10 7%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 34 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2019.
All research outputs
#15,558,163
of 23,124,001 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#4,521
of 5,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,107
of 113,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#42
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,124,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.