↓ Skip to main content

HEALTH GeoJunction: place-time-concept browsing of health publications

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Health Geographics, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
patent
1 patent
q&a
2 Q&A threads
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
HEALTH GeoJunction: place-time-concept browsing of health publications
Published in
International Journal of Health Geographics, January 2010
DOI 10.1186/1476-072x-9-23
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan M MacEachren, Michael S Stryker, Ian J Turton, Scott Pezanowski

Abstract

The volume of health science publications is escalating rapidly. Thus, keeping up with developments is becoming harder as is the task of finding important cross-domain connections. When geographic location is a relevant component of research reported in publications, these tasks are more difficult because standard search and indexing facilities have limited or no ability to identify geographic foci in documents. This paper introduces HEALTH GeoJunction, a web application that supports researchers in the task of quickly finding scientific publications that are relevant geographically and temporally as well as thematically.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 23%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 17%
Environmental Science 3 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 5 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2018.
All research outputs
#1,903,955
of 14,803,679 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Health Geographics
#87
of 528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,988
of 213,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Health Geographics
#7
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,803,679 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.