You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing interactions between the associations of common genetic susceptibility variants, reproductive history and body mass index with breast cancer risk in the breast cancer association consortium: a combined case-control study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Breast Cancer Research, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/bcr2797 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roger L Milne, Mia M Gaudet, Amanda B Spurdle, Peter A Fasching, Fergus J Couch, Javier Benítez, José Ignacio Arias Pérez, M Pilar Zamora, Núria Malats, Isabel dos Santos Silva, Lorna J Gibson, Olivia Fletcher, Nichola Johnson, Hoda Anton-Culver, Argyrios Ziogas, Jonine Figueroa, Louise Brinton, Mark E Sherman, Jolanta Lissowska, John L Hopper, Gillian S Dite, Carmel Apicella, Melissa C Southey, Alice J Sigurdson, Martha S Linet, Sara J Schonfeld, D Michal Freedman, Arto Mannermaa, Veli-Matti Kosma, Vesa Kataja, Päivi Auvinen, Irene L Andrulis, Gord Glendon, Julia A Knight, Nayana Weerasooriya, Angela Cox, Malcolm WR Reed, Simon S Cross, Alison M Dunning, Shahana Ahmed, Mitul Shah, Hiltrud Brauch, Yon-Dschun Ko, Thomas Brüning, GENICA Network, Diether Lambrechts, Joke Reumers, Ann Smeets, Shan Wang-Gohrke, Per Hall, Kamila Czene, Jianjun Liu, Astrid K Irwanto, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Helene Holland, kConFab, AOCS, Graham G Giles, Laura Baglietto, Gianluca Severi, Stig E Bojensen, Børge G Nordestgaard, Henrik Flyger, Esther M John, Dee W West, Alice S Whittemore, Celine Vachon, Janet E Olson, Zachary Fredericksen, Matthew Kosel, Rebecca Hein, Alina Vrieling, Dieter Flesch-Janys, Judith Heinz, Matthias W Beckmann, Katharina Heusinger, Arif B Ekici, Lothar Haeberle, Manjeet K Humphreys, Jonathan Morrison, Doug F Easton, Paul D Pharoah, Montserrat García-Closas, Ellen L Goode, Jenny Chang-Claude |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 19% |
| Unknown | 22 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 12% |
| Mathematics | 4 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 24 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2016.
All research outputs
#21,285,712
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research
#1,743
of 2,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,538
of 196,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research
#21
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,086 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.