Title |
Pre-operative intraocular pressure does not influence outcome of trabeculectomy surgery: a retrospective cohort study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Ophthalmology, March 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12886-015-0007-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nisha Nesaratnam, Nicholas Sarkies, Keith R Martin, Humma Shahid |
Abstract |
To investigate whether pre-operative intraocular pressure (IOP) predicts outcome of trabeculectomy surgery in patients with primary open angle glaucoma over a 3-year period of follow-up. Retrospective cohort study, of a total of 61 patients (80 procedures) who had undergone trabeculectomy surgery after failed medical management at a single centre between 2000 and 2011. Patients were identified through surgical logbooks. A subsequent case note-review identified 61 patients (80 procedures) with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). The primary outcome was success of trabeculectomy surgery, with failure defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) > 21 mmHg, ≤ 5 mmHg or not reduced by 20% at two consecutive follow-up visits 3-months post-operatively. Qualified success was defined as surgical success with the use of supplemental medical therapy. Secondary outcomes included visual acuity, Humphrey visual field MD, surgical complications and post-operative interventions. At 3 years, the odds ratio of failure was 0.93 per mmHg pre-operative IOP (95% C.I. 0.83-1.03, p = 0.15 Wald Χ (2) test), and the odds ratio of failure or qualified success was 0.96 (95% C.I. 0.89-1.04, p = 0.35). The incidence of surgical complications showed an odds ratio of 1.02 per mmHg pre-operative IOP (95% C.I. 0.95-1.10, p = 0.55 Wald Χ (2) test). The incidence of post-operative interventions showed an odds ratio of 1.01 per mmHg pre-operative IOP (95% C.I. 0.94-1.09, p = 0.80 Wald Χ (2) test). Pre-operative IOP does not predict success of trabeculectomy surgery in POAG patients during the first 3 years of follow-up. The incidence of surgical complications and post-operative interventions shows no association with pre-operative IOP. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 13% |
Researcher | 3 | 13% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 70% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 9% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 4% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 2 | 9% |