↓ Skip to main content

Alterations in PTEN and PIK3CA in colorectal cancers in the EPIC Norfolk study: associations with clinicopathological and dietary factors

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Alterations in PTEN and PIK3CA in colorectal cancers in the EPIC Norfolk study: associations with clinicopathological and dietary factors
Published in
BMC Cancer, April 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-11-123
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam Naguib, James C Cooke, Lisa Happerfield, Lucy Kerr, Laura J Gay, Robert N Luben, Richard Y Ball, Panagiota N Mitrou, Alison McTaggart, Mark J Arends

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 29%
Researcher 15 27%
Other 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Student > Master 3 5%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 14%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Unknown 9 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2022.
All research outputs
#7,558,494
of 23,056,273 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#2,098
of 8,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,229
of 109,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#14
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,056,273 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,371 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.