↓ Skip to main content

Differences in fruit and vegetable intake and their determinants among 11-year-old schoolchildren between 2003 and 2009

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differences in fruit and vegetable intake and their determinants among 11-year-old schoolchildren between 2003 and 2009
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-8-141
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Fischer, Johannes Brug, Nannah I Tak, Agneta Yngve, Saskia J te Velde

Abstract

Fruit and vegetable (FV) intake in children in the Netherlands is much lower than recommended. Recurrent appraisal of intake levels is important for detecting changes in intake over time and to inform future interventions and policies. The aim of the present study was to investigate differences in fruit and vegetable intake, and whether these could be explained by differences in potential determinants of FV intake in 11-year-old Dutch schoolchildren, by comparing two school samples assessed in 2003 and 2009.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iceland 1 1%
Benin 1 1%
Unknown 75 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 26%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 15 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 17%
Social Sciences 8 10%
Psychology 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 14 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2023.
All research outputs
#3,375,502
of 24,086,622 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,127
of 2,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,969
of 250,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#28
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,086,622 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.