↓ Skip to main content

Representing default knowledge in biomedical ontologies: application to the integration of anatomy and phenotype ontologies

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Representing default knowledge in biomedical ontologies: application to the integration of anatomy and phenotype ontologies
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, October 2007
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-8-377
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Hoehndorf, Frank Loebe, Janet Kelso, Heinrich Herre

Abstract

Current efforts within the biomedical ontology community focus on achieving interoperability between various biomedical ontologies that cover a range of diverse domains. Achieving this interoperability will contribute to the creation of a rich knowledge base that can be used for querying, as well as generating and testing novel hypotheses. The OBO Foundry principles, as applied to a number of biomedical ontologies, are designed to facilitate this interoperability. However, semantic extensions are required to meet the OBO Foundry interoperability goals. Inconsistencies may arise when ontologies of properties - mostly phenotype ontologies - are combined with ontologies taking a canonical view of a domain - such as many anatomical ontologies. Currently, there is no support for a correct and consistent integration of such ontologies. We have developed a methodology for accurately representing canonical domain ontologies within the OBO Foundry. This is achieved by adding an extension to the semantics for relationships in the biomedical ontologies that allows for treating canonical information as default. Conclusions drawn from default knowledge may be revoked when additional information becomes available. We show how this extension can be used to achieve interoperability between ontologies, and further allows for the inclusion of more knowledge within them. We apply the formalism to ontologies of mouse anatomy and mammalian phenotypes in order to demonstrate the approach. Biomedical ontologies require a new class of relations that can be used in conjunction with default knowledge, thereby extending those currently in use. The inclusion of default knowledge is necessary in order to ensure interoperability between ontologies.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 15%
United Kingdom 4 5%
Brazil 2 3%
Sweden 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Turkey 1 1%
Unknown 53 72%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Master 8 11%
Professor 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 42%
Computer Science 22 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Chemistry 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 11 15%