↓ Skip to main content

Relations as patterns: bridging the gap between OBO and OWL

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
citeulike
12 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relations as patterns: bridging the gap between OBO and OWL
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, August 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-11-441
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Hoehndorf, Anika Oellrich, Michel Dumontier, Janet Kelso, Dietrich Rebholz-Schuhmann, Heinrich Herre

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 8%
Germany 3 3%
Portugal 2 2%
Sweden 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Malaysia 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 69 77%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 38%
Student > Master 10 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 7 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 31%
Computer Science 27 30%
Arts and Humanities 6 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 7 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2018.
All research outputs
#8,709,380
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,255
of 7,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,772
of 104,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#24
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,750 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.