↓ Skip to main content

Endothelio-hematopoietic relationship: getting closer to the beginnings

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biology, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Endothelio-hematopoietic relationship: getting closer to the beginnings
Published in
BMC Biology, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1741-7007-9-88
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sabrina Gordon-Keylock, Alexander Medvinsky

Abstract

The close association between hematopoietic and endothelial cells during embryonic development led to the proposal that they may originate from a common ancestor--the hemangioblast. Due to a lack of unique specific markers for in vivo cell fate tracking studies, evidence supporting this theory derives mainly from in vitro differentiation studies. Teixeira and colleagues describe a novel enhancer that drives specific eGFP expression in blood islands of the electroporated chick embryo, thereby presenting a tool potentially suitable for analysis of hemangioblast differentiation and development of blood islands.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Israel 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 51 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 34%
Researcher 10 18%
Student > Master 9 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 5 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Engineering 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 5 9%