You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exploring the role of competing demands and routines during the implementation of a self-management tool for type 2 diabetes: a theory-based qualitative interview study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12911-019-0744-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sebastian Potthoff, Justin Presseau, Falko F. Sniehotta, Matthew Breckons, Amy Rylance, Leah Avery |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 34% |
| Canada | 3 | 9% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| Ireland | 2 | 6% |
| Israel | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 16 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 11 | 34% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 98 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 9% |
| Researcher | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 36 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 10% |
| Psychology | 6 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 40 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,931,249
of 25,080,267 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#102
of 2,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,789
of 449,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#5
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,080,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.