↓ Skip to main content

Attrition and bias in the MRC cognitive function and ageing study: an epidemiological investigation

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, April 2004
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Attrition and bias in the MRC cognitive function and ageing study: an epidemiological investigation
Published in
BMC Public Health, April 2004
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-4-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona E Matthews, Mark Chatfield, Carol Freeman, Cherie McCracken, Carol Brayne, MRC CFAS

Abstract

Any hypothesis in longitudinal studies may be affected by attrition and poor response rates. The MRC Cognitive Function and Ageing study (MRC CFAS) is a population based longitudinal study in five centres with identical methodology in England and Wales each recruiting approximately 2,500 individuals. This paper aims to identify potential biases in the two-year follow-up interviews. Initial non-response: Those not in the baseline interviews were compared in terms of mortality to those who were in the baseline interviews at the time of the second wave interviews (1993-1996). Longitudinal attrition: Logistic regression analysis was used to examine baseline differences between individuals who took part in the two-year longitudinal wave compared with those who did not. Initial non-response: Individuals who moved away after sampling but before baseline interview were 1.8 times more likely to die by two years (95% Confidence interval(CI) 1.3-2.4) compared to respondents, after adjusting for age. The refusers had a slightly higher, but similar mortality pattern to responders (Odds ratio 1.2, 95%CI 1.1-1.4). Longitudinal attrition: Predictors for drop out due to death were being older, male, having impaired activities of daily living, poor self-perceived health, poor cognitive ability and smoking. Similarly individuals who refused were more likely to have poor cognitive ability, but had less years of full-time education and were more often living in their own home though less likely to be living alone. There was a higher refusal rate in the rural centres. Individuals who moved away or were uncontactable were more likely to be single, smokers, demented or depressed and were less likely to have moved if in warden-controlled accommodation at baseline. Longitudinal estimation of factors mentioned above could be biased, particularly cognitive ability and estimates of movements from own home to residential homes. However, these differences could also affect other investigations, particularly the estimates of incidence and longitudinal effects of health and psychiatric diseases, where the factors shown here to be associated with attrition are risk factors for the diseases. All longitudinal studies should investigate attrition and this may help with aspects of design and with the analysis of specific hypotheses.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 112 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 18%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 13 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 31%
Psychology 20 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 9%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 22 19%