↓ Skip to main content

Cohort differences in disease and disability in the young-old: findings from the MRC Cognitive Function and Ageing Study (MRC-CFAS)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cohort differences in disease and disability in the young-old: findings from the MRC Cognitive Function and Ageing Study (MRC-CFAS)
Published in
BMC Public Health, July 2007
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-7-156
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carol Jagger, Ruth J Matthews, Fiona E Matthews, Nicola A Spiers, Judith Nickson, Eugene S Paykel, Felicia A Huppert, Carol Brayne, the Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study (MRC-CFAS)

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 5%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 51 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 12 22%
Unknown 11 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 22%
Social Sciences 11 20%
Psychology 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 13 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2017.
All research outputs
#7,472,947
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,896
of 14,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,552
of 68,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#22
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,886 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.