You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The effect of diabetes on burn patients: a retrospective cohort study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-019-2328-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Reinhard Dolp, Sarah Rehou, Ruxandra Pinto, Rachel Trister, Marc G. Jeschke |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
Mexico | 1 | 9% |
Colombia | 1 | 9% |
Germany | 1 | 9% |
Brazil | 1 | 9% |
United States | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
Other | 6 | 12% |
Unspecified | 5 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Unknown | 23 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 25% |
Unspecified | 5 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 25 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2019.
All research outputs
#6,878,604
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,847
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,003
of 446,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#92
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.