↓ Skip to main content

The RENAISSANCE (AIO-FLOT5) trial: effect of chemotherapy alone vs. chemotherapy followed by surgical resection on survival and quality of life in patients with limited-metastatic adenocarcinoma of…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The RENAISSANCE (AIO-FLOT5) trial: effect of chemotherapy alone vs. chemotherapy followed by surgical resection on survival and quality of life in patients with limited-metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction – a phase III trial of the German AIO/CAO-V/CAOGI
Published in
BMC Cancer, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12885-017-3918-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Salah-Eddin Al-Batran, Thorsten O. Goetze, Daniel W. Mueller, Arndt Vogel, Michael Winkler, Sylvie Lorenzen, Alexander Novotny, Claudia Pauligk, Nils Homann, Thomas Jungbluth, Christoph Reissfelder, Karel Caca, Steffen Retter, Eva Horndasch, Julia Gumpp, Claus Bolling, Karl-Hermann Fuchs, Wolfgang Blau, Winfried Padberg, Michael Pohl, Andreas Wunsch, Patrick Michl, Frank Mannes, Matthias Schwarzbach, Harald Schmalenberg, Michael Hohaus, Christian Scholz, Christoph Benckert, Jorge Riera Knorrenschild, Veit Kanngießer, Thomas Zander, Hakan Alakus, Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz, Claus Roedel, Manish A. Shah, Mitsuru Sasako, Dietmar Lorenz, Jakob Izbicki, Wolf O. Bechstein, Hauke Lang, Stefan P. Moenig

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 142 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 16 11%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Postgraduate 14 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 33 23%
Unknown 41 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Unspecified 3 2%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 48 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2020.
All research outputs
#6,209,002
of 24,657,405 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#1,524
of 8,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,751
of 452,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#41
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,657,405 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,750 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.