You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Listening to health workers: lessons from Eastern Uganda for strengthening the programme for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, January 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-12-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joseph Rujumba, James K Tumwine, Thorkild Tylleskär, Stella Neema, Harald K Heggenhougen |
Abstract |
The implementation and utilization of programmes for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) of HIV in most low income countries has been described as sub-optimal. As planners and service providers, the views of health workers are important in generating priorities to improve the effectiveness of the PMTCT programme in Uganda. We explored the lessons learnt by health workers involved in the provision of PMTCT services in eastern Uganda to better understand what more needs to be done to strengthen the PMTCT programme. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 75% |
Senegal | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Uganda | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 129 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 34 | 26% |
Researcher | 23 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 5% |
Other | 18 | 14% |
Unknown | 25 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 32% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 16% |
Social Sciences | 20 | 15% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
Other | 14 | 11% |
Unknown | 26 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2012.
All research outputs
#12,792,530
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,232
of 7,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,781
of 243,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#31
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,573 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.