↓ Skip to main content

Cleveland neural engineering workshop 2017: strategic evaluation of neural engineering

Overview of attention for article published in Bioelectronic Medicine, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 149)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
44 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cleveland neural engineering workshop 2017: strategic evaluation of neural engineering
Published in
Bioelectronic Medicine, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s42234-019-0017-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dustin J. Tyler, Christopher J. Czura, Jennifer French, Kip Ludwig, Kevin Otto, Forrest Pape, Cristin Welle

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Professor 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 10%
Materials Science 1 10%
Engineering 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,404,045
of 26,284,763 outputs
Outputs from Bioelectronic Medicine
#21
of 149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,292
of 451,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioelectronic Medicine
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,284,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them