You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Stepwise approach towards adoption of allergen immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis and asthma patients in daily practice in Belgium: a BelSACI‐Abeforcal‐EUFOREA statement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical and Translational Allergy, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13601-019-0243-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
P. W. Hellings, B. Pugin, G. Mariën, C. Bachert, C. Breynaert, D. M. Bullens, J. L. Ceuppens, G. Clement, T. Cox, D. Ebo, P. Gevaert, S. Halewyck, V. Hox, K. Ladha, R. Jacobs, P. Rombaux, R. Schrijvers, K. Speleman, X. Van der Brempt, L. Van Gerven, O. Vanderveken, B. Verhaeghe, K. Vierstraete, S. Vlaminck, J. ‐B. Watelet, J. Bousquet, S. F. Seys |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 5% |
| Romania | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Argentina | 1 | 5% |
| Belgium | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
| Researcher | 3 | 12% |
| Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 9 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,794,167
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#162
of 768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,946
of 453,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.