You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Economics methods in Cochrane systematic reviews of health promotion and public health related interventions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-6-55 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ian Shemilt, Miranda Mugford, Michael Drummond, Eric Eisenstein, Jacqueline Mallender, David McDaid, Luke Vale, Damian Walker, The Campbell & Cochrane Economics Methods Group (CCEMG) |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Kenya | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Peru | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 62 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Librarian | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 25% |
| Unknown | 8 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 49% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Decision Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 13 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,472,947
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,089
of 2,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,819
of 68,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,015 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.