↓ Skip to main content

The impact of injuries study. multicentre study assessing physical, psychological, social and occupational functioning post injury - a protocol

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The impact of injuries study. multicentre study assessing physical, psychological, social and occupational functioning post injury - a protocol
Published in
BMC Public Health, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-963
Pubmed ID
Authors

Denise Kendrick, Claire O'Brien, Nicola Christie, Carol Coupland, Casey Quinn, Mark Avis, Marcus Barker, Jo Barnes, Frank Coffey, Stephen Joseph, Andrew Morris, Richard Morriss, Emma Rowley, Jude Sleney, Elizabeth Towner

Abstract

Large numbers of people are killed or severely injured following injuries each year and these injuries place a large burden on health care resources. The majority of the severely injured are not fully recovered 12-18 months later. Psychological disorders are common post injury and are associated with poorer functional and occupational outcomes. Much of this evidence comes from countries other than the UK, with differing health care and compensation systems. Early interventions can be effective in treating psychological morbidity, hence the scale and nature of the problem and its impact of functioning in the UK must be known before services can be designed to identify and manage psychological morbidity post injury.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Canada 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Ghana 1 1%
Unknown 65 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 20%
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 30%
Psychology 9 13%
Social Sciences 7 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Engineering 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 15 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2012.
All research outputs
#9,508,271
of 12,372,633 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,974
of 8,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,057
of 222,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#579
of 720 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,372,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 720 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.