↓ Skip to main content

A Bayesian calibration model for combining different pre-processing methods in Affymetrix chips

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Bayesian calibration model for combining different pre-processing methods in Affymetrix chips
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, December 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-9-512
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marta Blangiardo, Sylvia Richardson

Abstract

In gene expression studies a key role is played by the so called "pre-processing", a series of steps designed to extract the signal and account for the sources of variability due to the technology used rather than to biological differences between the RNA samples. At the moment there is no commonly agreed gold standard pre-processing method and each researcher has the responsibility to choose one method, incurring the risk of false positive and false negative features arising from the particular method chosen. We propose a Bayesian calibration model that makes use of the information provided by several pre-processing methods and we show that this model gives a better assessment of the 'true' unknown differential expression between two conditions. We demonstrate how to estimate the posterior distribution of the differential expression values of interest from the combined information. On simulated data and on the spike-in Latin Square dataset from Affymetrix the Bayesian calibration model proves to have more power than each pre-processing method. Its biological interest is demonstrated through an experimental example on publicly available data.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 4 29%
Researcher 3 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Student > Master 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 14%
Computer Science 1 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 7%
Physics and Astronomy 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 29%