You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
VIA Family—a family-based early intervention versus treatment as usual for familial high-risk children: a study protocol for a randomized clinical trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13063-019-3191-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anne D. Müller, Ida C. T. Gjøde, Mette S. Eigil, Helle Busck, Merete Bonne, Merete Nordentoft, Anne A. E. Thorup |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 277 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 10% |
| Researcher | 16 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 40 | 14% |
| Unknown | 101 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 59 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 15 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 10% |
| Unknown | 107 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,940,699
of 23,613,071 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#1,041
of 6,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,912
of 442,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#31
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,613,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,085 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.