You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Double-labelling immunohistochemistry for MGMT and a “cocktail” of non-tumourous elements is a reliable, quick and easy technique for inferring methylation status in glioblastomas and other primary brain tumours
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Neuropathologica Communications, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2051-5960-1-22 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elinor Burke, Mariana Grobler, Kay Elderfield, Frances Bond, Matthew Crocker, Rohan Taylor, Leslie R Bridges |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 43% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2016.
All research outputs
#14,836,083
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
#1,110
of 1,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,678
of 197,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
#16
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,375 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.