↓ Skip to main content

Knowledge is power: studying critical incidents in intensive care

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Knowledge is power: studying critical incidents in intensive care
Published in
Critical Care, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/cc10593
Pubmed ID
Authors

Panagiotis Kiekkas, Diamanto Aretha, Nikolaos Stefanopoulos, George I Baltopoulos

Abstract

Despite their difficult definition and taxonomy, it is imperative to study critical incidents in intensive care, since they may be followed by adverse events and compromised patient safety. Identifying recurring patterns and factors contributing to critical incidents constitutes a prerequisite for developing effective preventive strategies. Self-reporting methodology, although widely used for studying critical incidents, has been criticized in terms of reliability and may considerably underestimate both overall frequency and specific types of them. Promotion of non-blaming culture, analysis of critical incident reports and development of clinical recommendations are expected to minimize critical incidents in the future.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Greece 1 3%
Unknown 28 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Postgraduate 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Professor 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 8 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 17%
Engineering 2 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 7 23%