You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Explaining the effects of a multifaceted intervention to improve inpatient care in rural Kenyan hospitals - interpretation based on retrospective examination of data from participant observation, quantitative and qualitative studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-6-124 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mike English, Jacinta Nzinga, Patrick Mbindyo, Philip Ayieko, Grace Irimu, Lairumbi Mbaabu |
| Abstract |
We have reported the results of a cluster randomized trial of rural Kenyan hospitals evaluating the effects of an intervention to introduce care based on best-practice guidelines. In parallel work we described the context of the study, explored the process and perceptions of the intervention, and undertook a discrete study on health worker motivation because this was felt likely to be an important contributor to poor performance in Kenyan public sector hospitals. Here, we use data from these multiple studies and insights gained from being participants in and observers of the intervention process to provide our explanation of how intervention effects were achieved as part of an effort to better understand implementation in low-income hospital settings. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 232 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 15% |
| Researcher | 34 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 52 | 21% |
| Unknown | 50 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 42 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 10% |
| Psychology | 13 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 12% |
| Unknown | 58 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2012.
All research outputs
#20,153,989
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,688
of 1,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,236
of 239,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#15
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.