↓ Skip to main content

Antenatal screening and the gendering of genetic responsibility

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Health, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antenatal screening and the gendering of genetic responsibility
Published in
Reproductive Health, September 2007
DOI 10.1186/1742-4755-4-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kate Reed

Abstract

The objective of this study is to explore men's and women's perceptions of antenatal blood screening. The study will assess the impact of these perceptions on decision-making regarding diagnostic testing and selective abortion, and on parental feelings of genetic responsibility. By exploring gender and antenatal screening in this way, the research aims to contribute to our understanding of lay perceptions of genetic screening and increase our knowledge of the decision-making process in screening. This qualitative study will be based on semi-structured interviews with twenty pregnant women and twenty male partners in the post-industrial city of Sheffield, UK. All interviews will be taped, transcribed and analysed thematically using NVIVO, a qualitative software package. The findings of this study have relevance to existing debates on the social and ethical implications of reproductive genetics. A better understanding of male and female perceptions of the screening process could improve guidance and practice in antenatal screening and genetic counselling. It will also inform and contribute to the development of theory on gender and genetic screening.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 23%
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 27%
Social Sciences 5 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 19%