↓ Skip to main content

Effect of COPD severity and comorbidities on the result of the PHQ-9 tool for the diagnosis of depression: results from the COSYCONET cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of COPD severity and comorbidities on the result of the PHQ-9 tool for the diagnosis of depression: results from the COSYCONET cohort study
Published in
Respiratory Research, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12931-019-0997-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Marietta von Siemens, Rudolf A. Jörres, Jürgen Behr, Peter Alter, Johanna Lutter, Tanja Lucke, Sandra Söhler, Tobias Welte, Henrik Watz, Claus F. Vogelmeier, Franziska Trudzinski, Winfried Rief, Britta Herbig, Kathrin Kahnert

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 101 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 5%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 49 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 50 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2019.
All research outputs
#19,954,338
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#2,510
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#328,077
of 455,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#48
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.