You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Persistent mutant oncogene specific T cells in two patients benefitting from anti-PD-1
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, February 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40425-018-0492-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kellie N. Smith, Nicolas J. Llosa, Tricia R. Cottrell, Nicholas Siegel, Hongni Fan, Prerna Suri, Hok Yee Chan, Haidan Guo, Teniola Oke, Anas H. Awan, Franco Verde, Ludmila Danilova, Valsamo Anagnostou, Ada J. Tam, Brandon S. Luber, Bjarne R. Bartlett, Laveet K. Aulakh, John-William Sidhom, Qingfeng Zhu, Cynthia L. Sears, Leslie Cope, William H. Sharfman, Elizabeth D. Thompson, Joanne Riemer, Kristen A. Marrone, Jarushka Naidoo, Victor E. Velculescu, Patrick M. Forde, Bert Vogelstein, Kenneth W. Kinzler, Nickolas Papadopoulos, Jennifer N. Durham, Hao Wang, Dung T. Le, Sune Justesen, Janis M. Taube, Luis A. Diaz, Julie R. Brahmer, Drew M. Pardoll, Robert A. Anders, Franck Housseau |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 37% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 11 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 53% |
Scientists | 5 | 26% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 16% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 19% |
Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
Researcher | 8 | 13% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 16% |
Unknown | 14 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 27% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 12 | 19% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Unknown | 17 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2020.
All research outputs
#3,086,331
of 26,163,973 outputs
Outputs from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#845
of 3,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,064
of 460,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#23
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,163,973 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.