↓ Skip to main content

Persistent mutant oncogene specific T cells in two patients benefitting from anti-PD-1

Overview of attention for article published in Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Persistent mutant oncogene specific T cells in two patients benefitting from anti-PD-1
Published in
Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40425-018-0492-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kellie N. Smith, Nicolas J. Llosa, Tricia R. Cottrell, Nicholas Siegel, Hongni Fan, Prerna Suri, Hok Yee Chan, Haidan Guo, Teniola Oke, Anas H. Awan, Franco Verde, Ludmila Danilova, Valsamo Anagnostou, Ada J. Tam, Brandon S. Luber, Bjarne R. Bartlett, Laveet K. Aulakh, John-William Sidhom, Qingfeng Zhu, Cynthia L. Sears, Leslie Cope, William H. Sharfman, Elizabeth D. Thompson, Joanne Riemer, Kristen A. Marrone, Jarushka Naidoo, Victor E. Velculescu, Patrick M. Forde, Bert Vogelstein, Kenneth W. Kinzler, Nickolas Papadopoulos, Jennifer N. Durham, Hao Wang, Dung T. Le, Sune Justesen, Janis M. Taube, Luis A. Diaz, Julie R. Brahmer, Drew M. Pardoll, Robert A. Anders, Franck Housseau

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 19%
Student > Master 9 15%
Researcher 8 13%
Other 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 14 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 27%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 17 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,975,085
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#812
of 3,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,193
of 456,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#22
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,436 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.