You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Operationalising sexual and reproductive health and rights in sub-Saharan Africa: constraints, dilemmas and strategies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-698x-11-s3-s8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rose Ndakala Oronje, Joanna Crichton, Sally Theobald, Nana Oye Lithur, Latifat Ibisomi |
| Abstract |
The continued poor sexual and reproductive health (SRH) outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa highlight the difficulties in reforming policies and laws, and implementing effective programmes. This paper uses one international and two national case studies to reflect on the challenges, dilemmas and strategies used in operationalising sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) in different African contexts. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 60% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 161 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 21% |
| Researcher | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Unknown | 44 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 38 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 12% |
| Arts and Humanities | 8 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Unknown | 48 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2012.
All research outputs
#15,168,964
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#11,305
of 17,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,394
of 248,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#129
of 236 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 236 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.