↓ Skip to main content

The accuracy of FAST in relation to grade of solid organ injuries: A retrospective analysis of 226 trauma patients with liver or splenic lesion

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Imaging, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The accuracy of FAST in relation to grade of solid organ injuries: A retrospective analysis of 226 trauma patients with liver or splenic lesion
Published in
BMC Medical Imaging, March 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2342-9-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beat Schnüriger, Joachim Kilz, Daniel Inderbitzin, Miranda Schafer, Ralph Kickuth, Martin Luginbühl, Daniel Candinas, Aristomenis K Exadaktylos, Heinz Zimmermann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Lecturer 3 9%
Other 8 25%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 66%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Unknown 7 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2019.
All research outputs
#21,275,730
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Imaging
#410
of 668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,532
of 111,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Imaging
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 668 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.