↓ Skip to main content

The feasibility of assessing frailty and sarcopenia in hospitalised older people: a comparison of commonly used tools

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Geriatrics, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
21 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The feasibility of assessing frailty and sarcopenia in hospitalised older people: a comparison of commonly used tools
Published in
BMC Geriatrics, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12877-019-1053-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kinda Ibrahim, Fiona F. A. Howson, David J. Culliford, Avan A. Sayer, Helen C. Roberts

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 166 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 18 11%
Student > Master 18 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Researcher 8 5%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 72 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 14%
Sports and Recreations 7 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 74 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,858,342
of 25,205,864 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#381
of 3,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,224
of 490,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#16
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,205,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 490,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.