↓ Skip to main content

Distance to health services influences insecticide-treated net possession and use among six to 59 month-old children in Malawi

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Distance to health services influences insecticide-treated net possession and use among six to 59 month-old children in Malawi
Published in
Malaria Journal, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-11-18
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter S Larson, Don P Mathanga, Carl H Campbell, Mark L Wilson

Abstract

Health ministries and providers are rapidly scaling up insecticide-treated nets (ITN) distribution to control malaria, yet possession and proper use typically remain below targeted levels. In Malawi, health facilities (HFs) are currently the principal points of ITN distribution, making it important to understand how access to these ITN sources affects ownership, possession, and use. The authors evaluated the association between proximity to HFs and ITN possession or use among Malawian children six to 59 months of age.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 2%
Kenya 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 103 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 20%
Student > Master 22 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Lecturer 8 7%
Other 26 24%
Unknown 13 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 27%
Social Sciences 18 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 4%
Other 22 20%
Unknown 21 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2021.
All research outputs
#15,806,699
of 25,117,541 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#4,015
of 5,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,566
of 255,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#55
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,117,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,856 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.